He had been frequently interrogated,
during his canvass, respecting his views on the subject of the new poor law which appeared to have created some uneasiness
here. He thought the new law objectionable, particularly the clause which compelled the separation of man and wife (great cheering). He considered that the clause was inhuman and contrary to the injunctions
of holy religion which enjoined that, “Whom God had joined together, no man should put asunder” (cheers). He thought
it extremely hard to compel an old couple even to go into the workhouse, after a life of toil and penury; he thought they
should have some allowance at home as formerly; but to separate them when there was, in his opinion, an act of the greatest
cruelty (loud cheers)
He considered that the law was defective
because it treated lightly the claims of a class of persons who were amongst the most valuable in the community; he meant
the working class (cheers). Who constituted the great bulwark of the country and an important source of its greatness ? Who
filled the ranks of our armies and manned our vessels of war and commerce ? Who were the means of production of our domestic
comforts and national wealth ? The Working Class, most certainly. They ought , therefore, to be protected and as he thought
their claims were infringed upon by a portion of the new Poor Law he should unite with those who would amend the objectionable
clauses.